This issue of OASE traces the role of drawing in landscape design and urbanism. It addresses ‘new traditions’ of the last 50 years, as well as recent concerns with ecological, metabolic and process-oriented questions.
decades, the drawing practices in landscape design and urbanism have
seen a number of transformations. Current developments in theory and
practice have rendered the distinction between the two more diffuse.
Both disciplines are no longer regarded as architecture – or gardening –
‘on a larger scale’, primarily anchored in questions of housing, land
development or embellishment. Today ecology, energy transition or
‘metabolic’ issues are much more present, which leads to new forms of
drawing. Leaving an object-oriented thinking behind, both disciplines
seem to be convinced of the importance of the process and the impact of
the factor of time. Space has become understood as an intersection – a
‘coagulation’ – of a multiplicity of flows and processes.
For designers it is an essential question how all these flows and processes come together, materialize, and become visible, and how their ‘spatialization’ in drawings is represented in analysis and design. The design and the drawing seem to be torn between a process-oriented agenda and a spatial intervention whose success depends on disciplinary expectations of care, materiality and intrinsic aesthetic qualities. Sustainable design not only presupposes a bold solution to the problem, but must also be beautiful, empathic and affective. What role does the drawing play – from cartography to sketch? Which traditions offer starting points? What innovations are needed?
Erratum December 2020
Unfortunately, the articles by Heidi Svenningsen Kajita (“Finding & Archiving”) and Holger Schurk (“The Potential of Abstraction”) are not included in the table of contents on the back of the paper edition of OASE 107. This mistake has been corrected in the e-book, but could not be corrected in the paper version anymore.
does the author’s ‘owning’ of a project mean? And does this sense of
ownership still prevail in contemporary architecture culture? Other more
open forms of cooperation and co-creation are emerging alongside the
concept of individual singular authorship.
series of concrete projects, the contributions in this issue explore the
field of tension between architectural aesthetics and issues of energy,
technology and materiality. Ecological practices in architecture must
not only be effective in providing solutions, but inevitably raise
questions of beauty, affection and perception as well.
Call for Abstracts OASE #115 about “Interferences: Migrating Practices in Europe”, written by Justin Agyin, Kornelia Dimitrova,
Christoph Grafe and Bernard Colenbrander. Deadline is June 19, 2022. Read the full text of the OASE #115 Call for Abstracts in the PDF.
Museums stage public encounters between visitors, objects and
stories. This is not limited to a tour through the exhibition spaces, it
starts already with monumental or ‘tresholdless’ entrances.
This issue of OASE makes a critical analysis of how soil connects to
urban planning and urban design, and how it can adjust those practices
in exploring new agendas.