- 124
- A Conversation with Alan Colquhoun
- Abstract
- In this interview Colquhoun addresses the present-day (im-)possibility of a metaphysical framework for judging architecture, alluding to the theories of Niklas Luhmann and Jacques Derrida. Both philosophers reject metaphysics – in its place Luhmann posits the great story of science, while arguing that we find ourselves, by definition and irrevocably, in a metaphysical tradition that we simultaneously deconstruct. General theories must therefore be approached cautiously, and a judgement can be nothing more than conditional and relative, they argue. This does not mean they exclude an ethical judgement, in Colquhoun’s view. The idea of history and the concepts of the past play a crucial role in this.
- Citation
- Grafe, C., & Avermaete, T. (2012). A Conversation with Alan Colquhoun. Alan Colquhoun. Architect, Historian, Critic, OASE, (87), 124–129. Retrieved from https://oasejournal.nl/en/Issues/87/AConversationWithAlanColquhoun
Download PDF (229 KB)
- Editors of this issue
- Christoph Grafe, Hans Teerds, Tom Avermaete
- August 2012
- English/Dutch
- Paperback/Illustrated (b/w)
- 170 × 240 mm
- Order this issueas hard copy or ebook
- ISSN0169 – 6238
- ISBN978-90-5662-855-0
- © NAi Publishers, 2012
- Subsidising institutions
- The Netherlands Architecture Fund