What is good architecture? The answer is as complex as the question is simple. OASE investigates the assumptions behind existing value models by having the question ‘what is good architecture?’ answered by people whose ‘preoccupation’ is architecture.
Although architecture is the subject of much writing and debate, architects, critics and historians seem to assume that an unequivocal value model for architecture does not exist. Moreover, the last models for architecture evaluation (modernism and postmodernism) have been followed by perversions (supermodernism, retromodernism) or by science-focused ideals (sustainability, computing models). Yet many problems in the world of architecture would disappar if what is meant by ‘good architecture’ were made clearer. Of course the question of good architecture cannot be answered unequivocally and definitively, but OASE is convinced that it is impossible to deal with architecture, with design, criticism, theory or history, without making assumptions about architectural quality, and that it is crucial to make these assumptions explicit.
OASE 90 / What is Good Architecture?
Index OASE 90
004
Editorial
007
A Spectacle of Deepest Harmony
010
An Architecture Close to its Inhabitants
014
Intentions, Inventions
016
Half an Hour of Silence
019
Social Space and Structuralism
023
Speaking Through the Silence of Perceptual Phenomena
025
A Possible Architecture
028
Friendly Architecture
031
Huh? Wow ≠ Wow! Huh?
035
Does ‘Good Architecture’ Deal with the Truth?
038
Richards’s Alternative
042
Good Architecture?
044
Wandering
047
Simply Good
051
Drawings
Colophon
- Core editors
- Christophe Van Gerrewey, Hans Teerds, Véronique Patteeuw
- Editors
- Anne Holtrop, Bruno Notteboom, Christoph Grafe, Christophe Van Gerrewey, David de Bruijn, Gus Tielens, Hans Teerds, Job Floris, Klaske Havik, Michiel Dehaene, Tom Avermaete, Tom Vandeputte, Véronique Patteeuw
- Design
- Karel Martens, Valentijn Goethals